On 1 July 2017, changes were made to the tax law in relation to the claiming of depreciation on certain assets used in residential rental properties. Since then, investors in residential rental properties have not been able to claim decline in value deductions in relation to the acquisition of second-hand assets or assets which were previously used for private purposes.
Now that the 2018 tax season is underway, and tax returns for the 2017–18 income year are being prepared and lodged, it is timely to revisit these new rules to ensure that taxpayers do not miss out on rightful deductions or claim amounts to which they are not entitled.
Prior to 1 July 2017, a purchaser of a residential rental property would allocate a portion of the purchase price to depreciating assets purchased with the property and claim depreciation deductions under Div 40 of the ITAA 1997.
This created opportunities for successive investors to ‘refresh’ the value of previously used depreciating assets and claim amounts in excess of their actual value or even original cost, resulting in a ‘double dip’ of claims for tax purposes across successive owners of the assets.
How the new rules operate
The Treasury Laws Amendment (Housing Tax Integrity) Act 2017 — which received Royal Assent on 30 November 2017 — addressed this issue by amending the tax law to limit deductions to outlays actually incurred by investors.
Limiting depreciation deductions
Section 40-27(2) reduces the amount a taxpayer can deduct for the depreciation of an asset under Div 40 or Subdiv 328-D of the ITAA 1997 (the small business entity depreciation rules) to the extent that the asset:
The rules apply to income years commencing on or after 1 July 2017 for assets:
This means that the new rules do not apply where the property was held before 7.30 pm on 9 May 2017 and was used wholly or partly for a taxable purpose in the 2016–17 income year.
Existing depreciating assets used or installed in residential rental properties held before 7.30 pm on 9 May 2017 — or acquired under contracts already entered into at 7.30 pm on 9 May 2017 — and which were used wholly or partly for a taxable purpose in the 2016–17 income year will continue to give rise to deductions for depreciation until either the investor no longer owns the asset, or the asset reaches the end of its effective life.
However, if the property was used solely for a non-taxable purpose in the 2016–17 income year, even if it was rented in an earlier income year(s), no deduction for depreciation is allowed in any later income year for assets that were used or installed in the property as at 7.30 pm on 9 May 2017.
What are ‘residential premises’?
The expression ‘residential premises’ takes on the same meaning as it has in the GST Act. The premises must be land or a building that is either occupied or intended to be occupied — and capable of being occupied — as a residence or for residential accommodation.
Once the character of the premises has been identified as residential premises, a ‘use’ test is applied.
The purpose for which the property is held is not relevant. The premises need only be suitable for occupation, rather than long-term occupation. For example, this includes a room that is only suitable for short term accommodation, but does not include a caravan (which is not land or a building) or a hospital (not intended for occupation as residential accommodation).
The depreciation deduction is denied only to the extent that the use of the asset is:
Assets used for other income generating activities in the premises will not be affected — e.g. where a certain part of the building was suitable only for commercial purposes (e.g. as a doctor’s surgery) and another part was suitable for residential accommodation.
When has an asset been ‘previously used’?
An asset has been ‘previously used’ if:
– in residential premises that were one of the taxpayer’s residences at that time; or
– for a purpose that was not a ‘taxable purpose’ and in a way that was not occasional.
Previous use can cover situations where another taxpayer, such as a property developer, has used an asset in a property both as trading stock and for another purpose.
The EM states that, for example, where a property developer:
‘Residence’ takes its ordinary meaning. A person may have more than one residence if they commonly occupy, or have available to occupy, two or more residential premises.
According to the EM, a dwelling an entity owns that is currently rented out to a tenant is not generally a residence of the entity at that time (even if it previously had been), whereas a holiday home that is principally held available and ready for the use of an entity may be the entity’s residence at that time.
This means that the new rules may apply to an asset that was held by the taxpayer and not previously used for a taxable purpose but is later used for a taxable purpose.
An asset will not be previously used if it has only occasionally been used for a purpose that is not a ‘taxable purpose’ within the meaning of Div 40. A ‘taxable purpose’ is defined in s. 40-25(7) as including the purpose of producing assessable income (amongst other things).
Use for a purpose is ‘occasional’ where the use is infrequent, minor and irregular. For example, according to the EM, spending a weekend in a holiday home or allowing relatives to stay free of charge for one weekend in the holiday home that is usually used for rent would generally be considered ‘occasional’ use.
Depreciation deductions are not denied under the new rules in any of the following circumstances:
Excluded entities are:
‘New residential’ premises has the same meaning as in s. 40-75 of the GST Act — i.e. includes premises that have:
‘Substantial renovations’ broadly means renovations in which substantially all of a building is removed and replaced. The installation of a new kitchen and bathroom is not, on its own, a ‘substantial renovation’.
The following five conditions must be satisfied to access this exception which is limited to circumstances where the asset is substantially new:
Deductions continue to be available for assets used in the course of carrying on a business for the purpose of producing income from the use of residential premises for residential accommodation — e.g. a taxpayer operating a hotel can deduct the decline in value of depreciating assets used for the purposes of the business in the hotel premises.
There is much commentary on what constitutes ‘carrying on a business’ which will not be considered here. Whether a taxpayer is carrying on a business is a question of fact, but ordinarily, the ATO would generally not regard, for example, a property owned by an individual taxpayer in the form of the provision of short-term or long-term accommodation as a business. The outcome would be different if the property were owned by a company (see the ATO’s draft ruling TR 2017/D7).
To which assets do the new rules apply?
The table below summarises when the new rules do and don’t apply.
|Cannot claim||Can claim|
|New rules apply to limit depreciation||New rules do not apply|
|Acquire a property on or after 7:30pm on 9 May 2017 that has not been ‘previously used’||Acquire a new property on or after 7:30 pm on 9 May 2017 that has not been ‘previously used’ (e.g. purchased new from a builder)|
|Replace an existing depreciating asset with a second-hand asset||Replace an existing depreciating asset with a new asset|
|Property held before 7:30pm on 9 May 2017 and used wholly in 2016-17 for a non-taxable purpose||Property held before 7:30pm on 9 May 2017 and used wholly or partly in 2016-17 for a taxable purpose|
Other tax implications
Application to small business entities
As noted above, there is an exception where the asset is used in carrying on a business.
Where a small business entity (SBE) chooses to calculate depreciation deductions using Subdiv 328-D rather than Div 40, Subdiv 328-D must be applied to all assets held by the SBE for a taxable purpose, even those not used in carrying on a business (s. 328-175).
There may be limited situations where an SBE holds assets used in gaining or producing assessable income from the use of residential premises to provide residential accommodation other than in the course of carrying on a business. In these circumstances, s. 328-175(9A) will operate to deny depreciation deductions under Subdiv 328-D.
Application to low-value pools
The Div 40 rules which govern the allocation of eligible assets to a low-value pool require the taxpayer to estimate the percentage of the total use of an asset that would be for a taxable purpose. Only this percentage of the value of the asset can be placed in the pool (s. 40-25(5)).
Where an asset is estimated to be put to a use for which s. 40-27 prevents a deduction being available, that ‘use’ will be for a purpose that is not a taxable purpose (s. 40-435(2)). This reduces the taxable purpose proportion for such assets and also the amount that will be included in the
low-value pool (to be deducted).
Future balancing adjustments and CGT consequences on sale of the propertyTax consequences will arise when the taxpayer sells, or otherwise ceases to hold, the property and/or the depreciating asset.
Where deductions have been reduced under s. 40-27, then at the time the asset ceases to be held:
The balancing adjustment amount (as calculated under s. 40-285) is reduced by the proportion of the depreciation that the taxpayer has not been entitled to deduct under s. 40-27.
This is consistent with the treatment of balancing adjustments for assets for which a taxpayer has not been able to deduct amounts because the asset has been used for a purpose other than a taxable purpose.
CGT event K7
CGT event K7 happens if a balancing adjustment event occurs in relation to a depreciating asset that has at some time been used for a purpose other than a taxable purpose. Unlike most CGT events, a capital gain/loss from CGT event K7 is not disregarded if it happens in relation to a depreciating asset that a taxpayer holds.
The amount of the capital gain or loss includes the proportion of the depreciation of the asset (that is, the difference between the termination value of the asset and its cost) that the taxpayer has not been able to deduct because of s. 40-27.
So, what should taxpayers look out for?
It will be important to identify:
These new rules are likely to increase compliance costs for taxpayers as they prepare their 2018 tax returns, but it will be necessary to consider whether depreciation claims that were allowable in earlier income years are now prevented from 1 July 2017 by these new rules.