New FBT exemption for electric vehicles

On 12 December 2022, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Electric Car Discount) Bill 2022 was enacted to provide an FBT exemption in respect of eligible electric vehicles. The exemption retrospectively applies to eligible car benefits provided from 1 July 2022.

The objective of the exemption is to encourage a greater take up of electric cars by making them more affordable and to reduce Australia’s carbon emissions from the transport sector. The exemption will be reviewed after three years to consider the electric car take-up. The ATO has indicated the Government will complete a review by mid-2027.

When does the FBT exemption apply?

The new s. 8A of the Fringe Benefits Tax (Assessment) Act 1986 provides that a car benefit is an exempt benefit in relation to a year of tax if:

  1. the benefit is provided in the year of tax in respect of the employment of a current employee; and
  2. the car is a zero or low emissions vehicle when the benefit is provided; and
  3. the value of the car, at the first retail sale must be below the luxury car tax threshold for fuel efficient cars, — which is $84,916 for the 2022-23 income year

note iconNote
The FBT exemption relates to car fringe benefits and therefore will only apply to vehicles that are ‘cars’ for FBT purposes.

What is a zero or low emissions vehicle?

A zero or low emissions vehicle, which is eligible for the FBT exemption, is defined as:

(a) a battery electric vehicle, or

(b) a hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicle, or

(c) a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle.

The legislation sets out the criteria defining each of the three categories of zero or low emission vehicles.

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles — exemption to end 31 March 2025

From 1 April 2025, a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle will not be considered a zero or low emissions vehicle under FBT law. However, the exemption will continue to apply if the use of the vehicle was exempt before that date, and there is a financially binding commitment to continue providing private use of the vehicle from that date.

Web Buttons (1)

Held and used on or after 1 July 2022

The exemption applies to a car benefit only if the earliest time when a person both held and used the car was at or after the start of 1 July 2022.

This involves two distinct tests:

  1. Whether the car was held by a person.
  2. Whether the car was used, in that the car was applied to, or taken to be available for use.

The exemption will only apply if the first time that both of these tests are met is after 1 July 2022.

Table 1

Associated car expenses

The FBT exemption extends to any associated benefit in running the eligible car for the period the car fringe benefit was provided, e.g. registration, insurance, repairs and maintenance, and fuel (including electricity).

note iconNote:
A home charging station is not a car expense associated with providing a car fringe benefit for electric cars. It may need to be considered as either property fringe benefit or an expense payment fringe benefit.

Other implications

  • Benefits provided under a salary packaging arrangement are included in the exemption.
  • The car limit ($64,741 for 2022–23) applies to cars that are FBT exempt, to reduce the first element of cost for depreciation purposes. .The value of the electric car benefit will be added to the employee’s reportable fringe benefit amount for each FBT year.

Further resources and upcoming training sessions

ATO webpage ‘Fringe benefits tax — Electric cars exemption’ (QC 71132)

TaxBanter’s online Monthly Special Topic to be held on 5 April 2023 is Using Cars. This session will provide an in-depth explanation of the exemption, including:

  • the three categories of eligible electric vehicles
  • when the exemption applies
  • when an exemption will continue to apply to a plug-in hybrid vehicle beyond 31 March 2025.

Register or learn more through the link below.

Web Buttons

Tax Yak Episode 63: Section 100A – reimbursement agreements

In this episode of Tax Yak, our host Tristan Webb chats with Christopher Ryan at the Australian Taxation Office, about the ATO’s recently finalised guidance on section 100A.

Host: Tristan Webb | Tristan on LinkedIn >

Guest: Christopher Ryan, Assistant Commissioner, Engagement and Assurance Services, Private Wealth Business Line, ATO


Want to get your Section 100A understanding to the next level?

Get our recording of our presentation Section 100A: Where are we now? 

Register for the recording >

 

Superannuation fund earnings for balances over $3m to be taxed at 30% from 1 July 2025

On Tuesday 28 February 2023, the Government announced that the superannuation fund concessional tax rate applied to accumulation phase earnings will increase from 15 per cent to 30 per cent for taxpayers with superannuation balances above $3 million, from the 2025–26 income year.

The Treasury has now released its Better targeted superannuation concessions factsheet containing more detail about how the proposed measure will operate.

By 2025–26 the reduction in the tax concession is expected to affect fewer than 80,000 individuals, or less than 0.5 per cent of people with a superannuation account.

The 2022–23 Tax Expenditures and Insights Statement — also released on Tuesday — shows that revenue foregone from superannuation tax concessions amounts to about $50 billion a year, and is projected to exceed the cost of the Age Pension by 2050. The proposed restriction to the tax concession is expected to generate revenue of about $2 billion in its first full year of revenue.

To which earnings will the 30% rate apply?

The higher 30 per cent rate only applies to the proportion of earnings corresponding to the part of the account balance that exceeds $3 million.

Blog Icon1Important
Earnings corresponding to the balance up to $3 million will continue to be taxed at the 15 per cent concessional rate.

Who will be liable for the tax?

The superannuation fund will continue to pay tax at 15 per cent on earnings in accummulation. The individual will be liable for the additional tax of 15 per cent.

How will earnings be calculated?

Earnings will be calculated with reference to the difference between the individual’s total superannuation balance (TSB) at the start and end of the financial year, adjusting for withdrawals and contributions.

note iconNote
An individual’s TSB includes all of their superannuation interests and is not a separate figure for each interest — i.e. the $3 million threshold will be applied on a per-individual basis and not on a per-account or per-fund basis.

Individuals can view their TSBs via ATO online services.

The Government seeks to avoid imposing significant and costly systems and reporting changes that could indirectly affect the majority of members who will be unaffected by this measure. The proposed approach is based on existing fund reporting requirements. As funds do not report (or generally calculate) taxable earnings at an individual member level, the proposed measure uses an alternative method for identifying taxable earnings for affected individuals.

The calculation method, as reproduced from the fact sheet, is as follows:

Snip 1

The formula calculates the difference between the member’s TSB for the current and previous financial years and adjusts for net contributions (which excludes contributions tax paid by the fund on behalf of the member) and withdrawals.

Blog Icon1Important

The calculation of earnings includes all notional (unrealised) gains and losses, similar to the way superannuation funds currently calculate members’ interests.

Upcoming Tax Update Button

What if a loss is calculated for a financial year?

Negative earnings will be able to be carried forward to reduce the tax liability in future years.

Paying the tax

Individuals will have the choice of either paying the tax themselves or from their superannuation funds.

Individuals with multiple funds will be able to elect the fund from which the tax is paid.

The tax will be separate to the individual’s personal income tax liabilities.

Notice of assessment and fund reporting

TSBs in excess of $3 million will be tested for the first time on 30 June 2026, with the first notices of a tax liability expected to be issued to individuals in the 2026–27 financial year.

Individuals will be notified of their liability to pay this tax by the ATO.

The Government intends to minimise any additional reporting requirements for superannuation funds. The ATO already uses superannuation fund reporting to calculate the total amount that individuals have in the superannuation system, for other purposes, such as eligibility to make non-concessional contributions.

Will defined benefit accounts be affected?

The Government intends to ensure broadly commensurate treatment for defined benefit interests. Treasury will consult on the appropriate treatment for defined benefit interests.

Will the retirement phase balance be affected?

While the media announcement focused on accumulation phase earnings, the subsequently released detailed fact sheet indicates that earnings subject to the additional tax will be calculated based on a comparison of the individual’s closing and opening TSBs. An individual’s TSB at a point in time relevantly includes the retirement phase value of their superannuation interests, as well as the accumulation phase value. Therefore the taxable earnings will take into account the unrealised gain or loss in the retirement phase balance as well as the accumulation phase value.

Will the $3 million threshold be indexed?

The media release and fact sheet are silent as to whether the $3 million threshold will be indexed.

Does this measure effectively represent a $3 million cap on accounts?

The proposed measure will not impose a limit on superannuation balances in the accumulation phase. It only affects the taxation of the earnings on the balance exceeding $3 million.

Is there any draft legislation?

Legislation has not yet been drafted. The Government will introduce legislation ‘as soon as practicable’ and will be consulting with the superannuation industry and other relevant stakeholders regarding implementation of the measure.

Examples (from Treasury fact sheet)

1. Calculation of earnings

Carlos is 69 and retired. His SMSF has a superannuation balance of $9 million on 30 June 2025, which grows to $10 million on 30 June 2026. He draws down $150,000 during the year and makes no  additional contributions to the fund.

This means Carlos’s calculated earnings are:

$10 million – $9 million + $150,000 = $1.15 million

His proportion of earnings corresponding to funds above $3 million is:

($10 million – $3 million) ÷ $10 million = 70%

Therefore, his tax liability for 2025–26 is:

15% × $1.15 million × 70% = $120,750

2. Election to pay liability from funds / concessional contributions

Louise is 40 and working. At 30 June 2026, she has a balance of $2 million in an APRA-regulated fund, and a balance of $3 million in an SMSF. At 30 June 2025, the balance of her APRA-regulated fund was $1.9 million and the balance of her SMSF was $2.9 million. She does not meet a condition of release, so she has no withdrawals during the year. She makes $20,000 of concessional contributions into her SMSF. Her contributions net of tax on contributions is $17,000.

This means Louise’s calculated earnings are:

$5 million – $4.8 million – $17,000 = $183,000

Her proportion of earnings corresponding to funds above $3 million is:

($5 million – $3 million) ÷ $5 million = 40%

This means her tax liability for 2025–26 is:

15% × $183,000 × 40% = $10,980

Louise elects to pay $5,000 from her APRA-regulated fund and $5,980 from her SMSF.

3. Carry forward of earnings loss

Dave is 70 and has two APRA-regulated funds and one SMSF. At 30 June 2025, his TSB across all funds was $7 million. During 2025–26, he withdraws $400,000 from his SMSF and makes no contributions. At 30 June 2026, his TSB across all funds is $6 million.

This means Dave’s calculated earnings are:

$6 million – $7 million + $400,000 = – $600,000

His proportion of earnings corresponding to funds above $3 million is:

($6 million – $3 million) ÷ $3 million = 50%

The earnings loss attributable to the excess balance is $300,000. Dave can carry forward the $300,000 to offset future excess balance earnings.

At 30 June 2027, Dave’s funds make earnings on his excess superannuation balance of $650,000. He carries forward the earnings losses attributable to his excess balance at 30 June 2026 of $300,000 and is only liable to pay the tax on $350,000 of earnings.

This means his tax liability for 2026–27 is:

15% × $350,000 = $52,000

Further info and resources

Join us at the beginning of each month as we review the current tax landscape. Our monthly Online Tax Updates and Public Sessions are excellent and cost effective options to stay on top of your CPD requirements. We present these monthly online, and also offer face-to-face Public Sessions at 17 locations across Australia.

Join us online
March Tax Update >
April Tax Update >

Join us at an upcoming workshop
Melbourne Tax Workshop > 9 March
Perth Tax Workshop > 9 March
Werribee Tax Workshop > 10 March
Newcastle Tax Workshop > 15 March

View all upcoming workshops >

Personalised training options

We can also present these Updates at your firm or through a private online session, with content tailored to your client base. Call our BDM Caitlin Bowditch at 0413 955 686 to have a chat about your specific needs and how we can assist.

Learn more about in-house training >

 

Our mission is to provide flexible, practical and modern tax training across Australia – you can view all of our services by clicking here.

The ATO’s new working from home deduction rules

The ATO has released its final guidance in relation to a revised fixed-rate approach to claiming deductions for additional running expenses incurred while working from home with effect from 1 July 2022. PCG 2023/1 is available here and the accompanying Compendium here.

See the ATO’s media release here and its updated website guidance here.

Working from home deductions for additional running expenses

There are two categories of working from home expenses. Running expenses relate to the use of facilities within the taxpayer’s home (e.g. electricity, depreciation, internet and phone), and occupancy expenses are incurred by the taxpayer to own, rent or use their home (e.g. mortgage interest, rent, rates and home insurance). The revised ATO guidance, and this article, only relate to the claiming of additional running expenses incurred as a result of working from home. For guidance on the deductibility of occupancy expenses, refer to TR 93/30 and the ATO website guidance.

The legislation does not prescribe any specific method of calculating deductions for running expenses, but the ATO has long established methods which it allows taxpayers to use.

Prior to 1 July 2022

Prior to 1 July 2022, to calculate a deduction for expenses incurred as a result of working from home, the taxpayer had the choice of using one of the following methods:

  • shortcut method — available from 1 March 2020 to 30 June 2022 — allowed 80 cents per hour for each hour a taxpayer worked from home. This temporary method was intended to provide administrative relief for the many taxpayers forced to work from home temporarily during COVID restrictions
  • fixed-rate method — available from 1 July 1998 to 30 June 2022 — allowed 52 cents per hour for each hour a taxpayer worked from home (a revised fixed-rate method applies from 1 July 2022 — see below)
  • actual cost method — calculating the actual expenses incurred as a result of working from home.

Changes from 1 July 2022

On Thursday 16 February, the ATO issued PCG 2023/1 titled Claiming a deduction for additional running expenses incurred while working from home — ATO compliance approach (the Guideline).

The Guideline outlines the ATO’s updated practical compliance approach, referred to as the revised fixed-rate method, which taxpayers can use to calculate their deduction for additional running expenses. The Guideline applies from 1 July 2022 and allows taxpayers to claim a rate of 67 cents per hour for particular expenses which are difficult to apportion, such as electricity and internet expenses. While the rate per hour has increased, the running costs included have changed and there are more record-keeping requirements.

Deductions for the decline in value of all work-related depreciating assets are calculated separately.

From 1 July 2022 the taxpayer can only:

  • use the revised fixed rate method to calculate the deduction, or
  • claim actual expenses.

From 1 July 2022, the 80 cents per hour shortcut method is no longer available. If a taxpayer is unable to use the revised fixed-rate method, they will need to use their actual expenses to claim a deduction.

note iconNote
The Guideline was issued in draft as PCG 2022/D4 (the draft Guideline) on 2 November 2022. Material changes between the draft and final Guidelines are noted in the summary of the Guideline below.

PS LA 2001/6 has been updated as a result of the publication of the Guideline to remove the rules for the former 52 cents per hour fixed-rate method.

The revised fixed-rate method from 1 July 2022 — PCG 2023/1

Eligibility to use the revised fixed-rate method

Taxpayers are eligible to rely on the Guideline to calculate deductions using the revised fixed-rate method if they meet the following criteria.

Criteria 1 — Working from home

The taxpayer must be working from home while carrying out their employment duties or while carrying on their business on or after 1 July 2022. The work has to be substantive and directly related to the taxpayer’s income-producing activities.

Criteria 2 — Incurring deductible additional running expenses

The taxpayer must incur additional running expenses listed in the Guideline (see below) which are deductible under s. 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 as a result of working from home.

A comparative exercise is not required to demonstrate that a taxpayer has incurred additional running expenses as a result of working from home. This can be demonstrated by the number of hours the taxpayer has worked from home.

Where a third party (e.g. an employer) reimburses a taxpayer for additional running expenses, the taxpayer will not satisfy this criterion.

Where invoices and bills are in the name of one member of the household but the cost is shared, each member of the household who contributes to the payment of that expense will be taken to have incurred it.

The additional running expenses which are covered by the 67 cents per hour rate differ from the expenses covered by the previous 52 cents per hour rate:

Table 1 Wfh Blog

Under both the former and new fixed-rate rules, a taxpayer who uses the fixed-rate method to calculate their deduction for additional running expenses cannot claim a separate deduction for any expenses covered by the rate (Check Mark). They can however, claim a separate deduction for any expenses not covered by the rate (Crossed Out), in accordance with the relevant rules, e.g. s. 8-1 general deductions, Div 40 decline in value deductions or Div 28 car expense deductions. These additional deductions are not subject to the ATO’s compliance approach that applies to the relevant fixed-rate method.

note iconNote
In response to a submission that the inclusion of mobile phone expenses in the revised fixed-rate, particularly taxpayers with high mobile phone expenses, is unfair, the ATO notes in the Compendium that based on its evidence, taxpayers find it difficult to apportion mobile phone expenses and including this expense in the rate overcomes this difficulty. A deduction for the decline in value of the phone can also be claimed.

The ATO provides the same explanation for the inclusion of internet expenses in the revised fixed rate.

Cleaning expenses are not included in the rate as they are only deductible where a taxpayer has a separate dedicated home office space, which is not a requirement to use the revised fixed-rate method.

Criteria 3 — Keeping and retaining relevant records

The taxpayer must keep:

  • records showing the total number of hours they worked from home during the income year (see below)
  • one document (e.g. an invoice, bill or credit card statement), for each of the listed running expenses which they have incurred during the income year.

In addition, a taxpayer claiming a deduction for the decline in value of depreciating assets (separately from the fixed-rate per hour deduction) used while working from home must keep relevant records (see below).

Upcoming Tax Update Button

Calculating the deduction using the revised fixed-rate method

A taxpayer’s total deduction for running expenses using the revised fixed-rate method is calculated using the following steps:

Table 2 Wfh Blog

Record-keeping requirements

Keeping records of hours worked

For the 2022–23 income year

Special transitional rules apply for the 2022–23 income year. A taxpayer must keep the following records:

  • from 1 July 2022 to 28 February 2023 — a record which is representative of the total number of hours worked from home
  • from 1 March to 30 June 2023 — a record of the total number of actual hours worked from home for the period.

In the draft Guideline, taxpayers could use a representative record only until 31 December 2022. The end date has been extended as the Guideline was not finalised until 16 February 2023.

For the 2023–24 and later income years

From 1 July 2023, A taxpayer must keep a record for the entire income year of the number of hours worked from home.

A record of hours for the income year can be in any form, provided it is kept contemporaneously. For example, records may be kept in one of the following forms:

  • timesheets
  • rosters
  • logs of time the taxpayer spent accessing employer systems or online business systems
  • time-tracking apps
  • a diary or similar document kept contemporaneously.

(The third and fourth examples have been included since the draft Guideline was published.)

This is not an exhaustive list of the types of records which may be appropriate.

Warning Fade VariationImportant
The ATO will not accept an estimate based on hours worked during a shorter period during the income year.

Keeping records of running expenses

The taxpayer must also keep evidence for each of the additional running expenses that they incurred.

For energy, mobile and home phone and internet expenses, the taxpayer must keep one monthly or quarterly bill. If the bill is not in the taxpayer’s name, they will also have to keep additional evidence showing they incurred the expenses, e.g. a joint credit card statement showing payment or a lease agreement showing they share the property, and therefore the expenses, with others.

For stationery and computer consumables, which are occasional expenses, the taxpayer must keep one receipt for an item purchased.

Not Yet Law 2Critical Point
If the taxpayer does not keep evidence of the total hours they worked from home and for each of the running expenses they incurred, they will not be able to rely on the Guideline to calculate their additional running expenses.

Keeping records for decline in value

As the decline in value of depreciating assets is not covered by the revised fixed-rate per hour, to claim a deduction for decline in value the taxpayer must keep the written evidence required by Div 900 or the ITAA 1997 (for employees) and s. 262A of the ITAA 1936 (for taxpayers carrying on a business).

An employee must keep, for each depreciating asset, a document which shows:

  • the name or business name of the supplier
  • the cost of the asset
  • the nature of the asset
  • the day the asset was acquired
  • the day the record was made out.

The taxpayer must also keep records which demonstrate their work-related use of the depreciating asset. This can be evidenced by records of a representative four-week period that show personal and income-producing use of the depreciating assets.

For depreciating assets used in carrying on a business, they must keep records that record and explain all transactions.

The ATO’s compliance approach

The Commissioner will not apply compliance resources to review a taxpayer’s deduction for working from home expenses if the taxpayer:

  • meets the eligibility criteria to use the revised fixed-rate method
  • uses the method to calculate additional running expenses incurred as a result of working from home.

Warning Fade VariationImportant
The Guideline will not apply if:

    • the number of hours which the taxpayer uses in Steps 1 and 2 above exceeds the number of hours they actually worked at home
    • the taxpayer claims a separate deduction for any of the listed expenses
    • the taxpayer lodges an objection in relation to their working from home expenses for whatever reason — only the actual expenses the taxpayer incurred as a result of working from home and for which the taxpayer has adequate records will be allowed as a deduction.

The ATO notes that:

‘When a taxpayer disputes whether a working from home expense is deductible, either at objection or before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal or Courts, they will need to establish that the particular expense was incurred and is deductible under the law. This is a different process to us not applying compliance resources to verify if a particular expense is deductible.’

Examples

The Guideline contains eight practical examples.

Example 2 — Taxpayer cannot rely on the practical compliance approach

Dan is employed as a financial adviser. Under the terms of his employment agreement, Dan must be in the office at least 3 days per week and can either work in the office or from home for the other 2 days per week. Dan only works from home if he does not have client meetings, so he does not always work 2 days per week from home.

In his tax return for the 2022–23 income year, Dan claims a deduction of $815 for his working from home expenses using the revised fixed-rate method.

In February 2024, Dan’s claim for his working from home expenses for the 2022–23 income year is subject to review by the ATO. When he responds to the request to substantiate his claim of $815, Dan sends a document setting out the following calculation:

Hours worked from home = 2 days per week × 8 hours per day × 49 weeks = 784 hours

Office chair = $290

Additional running expenses = 784 hours × 67c = $525

Total deduction = $525 + $290 = $815.

Dan does not provide any records to demonstrate that he worked from home for 784 hours during the income year, nor does he provide any evidence to show he incurred any running expenses. However, he does provide his purchase receipt for the chair that shows it was purchased on 10 December 2022 for $290.

When questioned about how he calculated the number of hours he worked from home, Dan indicates that he estimated that he worked from home on average for 2 days each week for around 8 hours a day and that he had 3 weeks’ leave during the year. In relation to his running expenses, Dan indicates he incurred electricity, internet and mobile phone expenses and that he might have some documents to demonstrate he incurred them but he would need to look for them.

When Dan is asked if he was able to locate one bill for his electricity, internet and mobile phone expenses, Dan indicates that he has been able to locate a mobile phone and internet bill but not any of his electricity bills. However, Dan is able to provide one of his credit card statements showing a payment to an electricity provider on 10 February 2023.

Dan cannot rely on the practical compliance approach because he has not kept a record of the hours he worked from home during the income year. Instead, an estimate was provided.

However, Dan can claim the actual expenses he incurred as a result of working from home. Based on the evidence Dan has been able to provide, his only deduction will be for his office chair. As the office chair costs less than $300 and was only used for work purposes, Dan’s deduction for working from home expenses is reduced from $815 to $290.

If Dan objects to his Notice of Amended Assessment for the 202–-23 income year, he is not able to use the revised fixed-rate method as the basis for his objection. He must use the actual expenses method. The objection would only be allowed if he is able to substantiate that these expenses were incurred as a result of working from home.

Example 6 — Taxpayer not incurring additional running expenses

Sergei is employed as a graphic design artist. He works in the office 3 days per week and works from home 2 days per week. Sergei lives with his parents and when he works from home, he works in his bedroom using his employer-provided laptop and mobile phone. Sergei does not pay his parents any rent and he does not contribute to any of the household bills.

Although Sergei is carrying out his employment duties while working from home, he is not incurring additional running expenses. Accordingly, Sergei is not entitled to a deduction for additional running expenses and he cannot rely on the Guideline.

Example 7 — Keeping and retaining relevant records

Pamela is employed as a solicitor. She works from home some evenings or on the weekend, in order to meet deadlines. The number of hours Pamela works from home varies from week to week.

During the income year, Pamela keeps a record of the total number of hours she spends working from home. She does this by making an entry in her electronic calendar when she starts and finishes working from home on a particular day.

When she is working from home during the income year, Pamela incurs electricity and internet expenses. Pamela is also claiming the decline in value of a desk and a laptop computer she uses when she works at home.

To show she has incurred additional running expenses, Pamela keeps:

  • one quarterly electricity bill
  • one monthly invoice for her home internet
  • receipts for the desk and laptop that she purchased and uses while working from home
  • records demonstrating her work-related use of her desk and laptop.

Pamela has kept relevant records for the income year. If Pamela meets the other criteria in the Guideline, she can rely on the Guideline to calculate her additional running expenses.

Further info and training

Join us at the beginning of each month as we review the current tax landscape. Our monthly Online Tax Updates and Public Sessions are excellent and cost effective options to stay on top of your CPD requirements. We present these monthly online, and also offer face-to-face Public Sessions at 17 locations across Australia.

Join us online
March Tax Update >
April Tax Update >

Join us at an upcoming workshop
Gold Coast Tax Workshop > 22 Feb
Mitcham Tax Workshop > 24 Feb
Fremantle Tax Workshop > 2 March
Melbourne Tax Workshop > 9 March

View all upcoming workshops >

Personalised training options

We can also present these Updates at your firm or through a private online session, with content tailored to your client base. Call our BDM Caitlin Bowditch at 0413 955 686 to have a chat about your specific needs and how we can assist.

Learn more about in-house training >

 

Our mission is to provide flexible, practical and modern tax training across Australia – you can view all of our services by clicking here.

 

 

 

When a taxpayer may apply the main residence exemption to sell an inherited dwelling CGT-free

In 2018, housing wealth represented 54 per cent of total wealth for Australians aged 60 to 99. This is set to increase to 66 per cent by 2048. Notably, inheritance of real estate is anticipated to reach about $100bn (in 2019 dollars) in 2035, assuming house prices rise in line with inflation.

TaxBanter regularly receives client queries in relation to how the CGT main residence exemption (MRE) applies in the case of an inherited dwelling.

The beneficiary who inherits the deceased’s main residence has multiple options including:

  • selling the dwelling as soon as possible
  • developing the property and selling it
  • moving into it
  • allowing another family member to live in it (sometimes this is a term of the Will)
  • a combination of the above.

What the beneficiary does with the property will impact the extent the MRE will apply. Another significant factor is whether the deceased used the dwelling for income-producing purposes before their death.

The MRE

The MRE rules provide a tax exemption for a capital gain that an individual makes upon the sale of a dwelling that is their ‘main residence’. A full exemption applies where the property was the taxpayer’s main residence for the entire duration of their ownership. The exemption is reduced — to a partial exemption — where the dwelling was not the taxpayer’s main residence for a period of time and where the dwelling was used for an income-producing purpose. Special rules also apply to allow the taxpayer to treat the dwelling as their main residence for a period of time even though they were absent from the property.

Mre Button

How the MRE applies to an inherited dwelling

A taxpayer who inherits a dwelling can also access the MRE in relation to a capital gain on the sale of that property if a number of conditions are satisfied.

Note: Special rules apply to modify the cost base (or reduced cost base) in the hands of the beneficiary for the purposes of calculating the capital gain (or loss).

Conditions for a full exemption

If the deceased had acquired the dwelling post-CGT, it must have been their main residence just before death and was not being used to derive income. If it was acquired pre-CGT then the use of the property is not relevant.

In addition, one of the following must apply:

  • the ownership period of the beneficiary ends — i.e. the settlement (and not the contract date) of the sale of the property by the beneficiary occurs — within two years of the deceased’s death, unless the Commissioner allows a longer period, or
  • from the deceased’s death until the end of the ownership period, the dwelling was the main residence of one or more of:
    • the spouse of the deceased
    • an individual who had a right to occupy the dwelling under the deceased’s Will, or
    • the beneficiary.

Finally, the MRE can only apply if the deceased was not an ‘excluded foreign resident’ just before their death, i.e. they had been a foreign resident for a continuous period of more than six years.

If not all of the above conditions are satisfied, this does not mean that the beneficiary cannot access the exemption. They may still be eligible for a partial exemption.

A partial exemption for inherited dwellings

If a full exemption does not apply — i.e. the taxpayer cannot satisfy all of the MRE requirements listed above — then the capital gain (or loss) is calculated as follows:

Snip1

This may result in a partial exemption or no exemption at all.

The number of ‘non-main residence days’ is the total of the following:

Snip2

The number of ‘total days’ is:

Snip3

Adjustments to the number of non-main residence days or the total days apply in certain circumstances, and also where the deceased had themselves inherited the dwelling.

A simple example

Tricia’s grandfather Robert acquired a dwelling in October 2004. He passed away in October 2019 and the property passed to Tricia under the terms of Robert’s Will.

From October 2006 to October 2016, the dwelling was rented out to a third party tenant and was not Robert’s main residence (assume that he had another property that he was living in and his executor has chosen the other property to be treated as Robert’s main residence during that period). He moved back into the property and it was his main residence again from October 2016 until his death in October 2019.

Once she inherited the property Tricia rented it out to a third party. She sold it in 2024 and settlement occurred in October 2024. Tricia makes a capital gain of $200,000 (in these circumstances the first element of cost base in Tricia’s hands is the market value of the property on the day of death).

Tricia is ineligible for a full MRE as she did not dispose of the dwelling within two years of Robert’s death (i.e. by October 2021).

Tricia’s taxable capital gain, applying a partial MRE, is calculated as follows:

$200,000 × 15 yrs / 20 yrs = $150,000

Non-main residence days = 15 years — comprising:

  • number of days in Robert’s ownership period when the dwelling was not his main residence = 10 years (Oct 2006 to Oct 2016)
  • number of days in the period from Robert’s death until Tricia’s ownership interest ends — the dwelling was not the main residence of any of the listed individuals = 5 years (Oct 2019 to Oct 2024).

Total days = number of days from Robert’s acquisition until Tricia’s ownership interest ends = 20 years (Oct 2004 to Oct 2024).

Tricia can access the general CGT discount, i.e. the taxable gain is $75,000.

Alternative scenario

Now assume that all of the above facts apply except that the settlement of Tricia’s sale of the dwelling occurred in October 2020 — i.e. within two years of Robert’s death.

Tricia is eligible for a full CGT exemption on the $400,000 capital gain. Because Robert has been living in the dwelling and not using it to derive income just before his death, Tricia notionally ‘saves’ tax on $150,000 compared to the partial exemption scenario, even though in both scenarios the property was not Robert’s main residence for 10 years out of the 15 years of his ownership and Tricia had rented it out for the entirety of her ownership period.

Further training

How the MRE applies in various inheritance situations, and other aspects of the MRE rules, will be explained with practical examples in our upcoming Online Special Topic presentation – click here to register, or visit our upcoming training page for more information.

Main Residence Exemption | Presenting on 8 February 2023 @ 11am AEDT

Live Button

Recording Button

Our mission is to provide flexible, practical and modern tax training across Australia – you can view all of our services by clicking here.

Now hiring: Administrative Assistant role available [Melbourne, hybrid]

TaxBanter is a member of the Diverger Group (ASX:DVR) and is a premium brand in tax training.  We are now looking for an Administrative Assistant to work with our growing Operations team.

About the role

Working as part of our Operations team, our Administrative Assistants are responsible for maintaining our national client base and training schedule.

We’ll provide comprehensive training on our services and offerings so you can succeed in the role. You’ll work from our Melbourne CBD office with flexible workplace options once you are fully onboarded.

KEY JOB RESPONSIBILITIES/ACCOUNTABILITIES

  • Client liaison to effectively organise training sessions and deal with general client queries.
  • Onboarding new clients and establishing professional relationships with existing clients.
  • Assisting with trainer scheduling and workflow management.
  • Managing our internal client database and internal records.
  • Providing support to the management team.
  • Various administrative tasks as required.

KNOWLEDGE, EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

  • 1+ years of administrative experience, preferably in a corporate environment (accounting/finance industry experience would be highly regarded).
  • Proven track record of strong customer service skills.

PERSONAL QUALITIES

  • Excellent written, verbal and interpersonal communication skills.
  • Excellent time management and ability to prioritise work.
  • Problem-solving mindset.

Apply Now

Questions? Email us at careers@taxbanter.com.au.

ATO has released finalised section 100A guidance

On 8 December 2022, the ATO released its long anticipated final guidance on s. 100A of the ITAA 1936.

TR 2022/4 titled Income tax: s. 100A reimbursement agreements (the Ruling) sets out the Commissioner’s view in respect of the application of s. 100A.

PCG 2022/2 titled Section 100A reimbursement agreements — ATO compliance approach (the Guideline) sets out the ATO’s compliance approach, including how the ATO will assess the taxpayer’s risk level. Both documents contain a number of practical examples.

Together the Ruling and the Guideline are referred to as the finalised guidance.

The finalised guidance was previously issued in draft in February 2022 as TR 2022/D1 and PCG 2022/D1 respectively, and differs from the drafts in a number of respects. Broadly, these include:

  • the removal of the blue zone from the risk framework — reducing the number of coloured zones from four to three
  • the amendments to the green zone scenarios
  • the inclusion of recent case law
  • additional guidance in relation to a number of matters
  • additional examples and revisions to draft examples
  • a new section on record keeping requirements.

A Compendium accompanies each of the Ruling and the Guideline, setting out the Commissioner’s responses to comments received during consultation, including changes reflected in the finalised guidance — refer to TR 2022/4EC and PCG 2022/2EC.

The ATO has updated its website guidance on s. 100A titled Trust taxation — reimbursement agreement (QC 41167) to reflect the finalised guidance.

Date of effect

The finalised guidance will apply both before and after its date of issue (8 December 2022).

In relation to entitlements arising before 1 July 2022, note that:

  • the Commissioner will stand by the administrative position reflected in Trust taxation — reimbursement agreement, which was first published on the ATO website in July 2014, to the extent that it is more favourable to the taxpayer’s circumstances than PCG 2022/2
  • the ATO will not dedicate compliance resources to consider the application of s. 100A where the taxpayer demonstrates that a) their arrangement satisfies the white zone, or b) they have taken reasonable care in applying the administrative position in Trust taxation — reimbursement agreement to determining that s. 100A does not apply.

Legislative background

Section 100A of the ITAA 1936 is an anti-avoidance provision which, subject to the ordinary dealing exception, applies in cases in which a beneficiary has become presently entitled to trust income where it has been agreed that another person will benefit, and that agreement is made by any of its parties with a purpose that some person will pay less or no income tax as a result.

Broadly, the effect where s. 100A applies — i.e. where a beneficiary’s present entitlement arises from a reimbursement agreement — is that:

  • the beneficiary is deemed not to be, and never to have been, presently entitled to the relevant trust income
  • the trustee, and not the beneficiary, is made liable to tax at the top marginal rate on amounts that would generally otherwise be included in the assessable income of the beneficiary in respect of the present entitlement.

NoteNote: There are two Federal Court decisions which concern s. 100A that are currently subject to appeal in the Full Federal Court. Those decisions are Guardian AIT Pty Ltd ATF Australian Investment Trust v FCT [2021] FCA 1619 (Guardian) and BBlood Enterprises Pty Ltd v FCT [2022] FCA 1112 (BBlood). The Ruling refers to these cases.

In the ATO’s view, there is no reimbursement agreement and s. 100A will not apply to a beneficiary’s present entitlement to trust income where any of the following apply:

(a) The beneficiary is under 18 years of age or otherwise under a legal disability.

(b) Only the beneficiary benefits from their trust entitlement and no one else benefits from the beneficiary’s share of trust net income and trust capital gains.

(c) There was no agreement, arrangement or understanding to provide a benefit to someone other than the beneficiary at the time the beneficiary became presently entitled.

The four basic requirements for s. 100A to apply

1) Connection requirement

There must be a present entitlement, or deemed present entitlement, of a beneficiary (other than a beneficiary under a legal disability) to a share of trust income, which has arisen out of, in connection with or as a result of a reimbursement agreement (being an agreement, understanding or arrangement that has the three qualities described in requirements 2, 3 and 4 below).

‘Agreement’ is defined widely to include arrangements and understandings whether formal, informal, express or implied. An agreement can include a single step or a series of steps or transactions.

2) Benefits to another requirement

The agreement must provide for the payment of money or transfer of property to, or provision of services or other benefits for, a person other than that beneficiary.

3) Tax reduction purpose requirement

One or more of the parties to the agreement must have entered into it for a purpose (which need not be a sole, dominant or continuing purpose) of securing that a person would be liable to pay less tax in an income year than they otherwise would have been liable to pay.

 4) Ordinary dealing exception

Agreements entered into in the course of ordinary family or commercial dealing are not reimbursement agreements for the purposes of s. 100A. This ‘ordinary dealing’ test is an objective test applied, at least principally, from the perspective of the persons whose purposes are relevant to the operation of s. 100A.

It is the whole dealing in the course of which the agreement is entered into which must have the quality of ‘ordinary family or commercial dealing’.

To test whether there is ordinary family or commercial dealing, consider all relevant circumstances, including what is sought to be achieved by the dealing (in particular, whether it is explained by the family or commercial objectives it will achieve) and whether the steps that comprise the dealing will likely achieve those objectives.

Factors relevant to whether a dealing is ‘ordinary family or commercial dealing’ can include family living arrangements, financial dependence on one another, cultural traditions, and financing arrangements.

‘Family’ takes its ordinary meaning— i.e. a relationship of natural persons based on birth or affinity, and may often involve co-residence. The exception does not apply just because all parties to an agreement are family members.

Features indicating that a dealing may not be ordinary family or commercial dealing include:

  • the arrangement is artificial, contrived, is overly complex or contains steps that might be explained by objectives different to those said to be behind the ordinary family or commercial dealing
  • circumstances or conduct that is inconsistent with the legal or economic consequences of the beneficiary’s entitlement, such as:
  • appearing unlikely that the beneficiaries will receive their entitlements when the assets or funds representing the entitlement are purportedly paid or lent to others without any intention of being returned or repaid
  • funds representing the entitlement are dealt with in a way that is inconsistent with the beneficiary’s right to demand the entitlement
  • beneficiaries are not informed of their entitlements
  • where income entitlements have actually been paid to the beneficiary and there is an agreement for the beneficiary to pay some or all of their income entitlement to another person.

Table1

Table2

Consequences of a reimbursement agreement

Section 100A disregards a beneficiary’s entitlement to the extent that it arises out of a reimbursement agreement. This means that the net income that would otherwise have been assessed to the beneficiary (or trustee on their behalf) is instead assessed to the trustee at the top marginal tax rate.

There is comparable treatment for a reimbursement agreement that involves franked distributions or capital gains.

Table3

Compliance approach — the risk framework

The following table describes the ATO’s compliance approach for arrangements to which s. 100A may apply:

Table4

Table5

Table6

Arrangements outside of the zones

For arrangements not within the white, green or red zones, the following principles may indicate whether the arrangement has a higher risk of the ATO dedicating compliance resources to consider the application of s. 100A:

(a)          a benefit is provided to a person other than the beneficiary

(b)          the provision of that benefit involves complexity or contrivance

(c)           that benefit could have been provided in a more direct manner

(d)          the arrangement results in significantly less tax being paid compared to if the benefit had been provided more directly.

Record keeping

While each arrangement depends on its facts, the following documents and records are important and should be kept wherever possible:

  • the trust deed (including amendments), trustee resolutions and contact details of the trustee and former trustees
  • notes, contemporaneous documents and records of discussions or meetings explaining the transactions that have happened or calculations that have been made
  • details of how the beneficiary was notified of their present entitlement to trust income
  • details of how the present entitlement to trust income was satisfied and, where practical, used by the beneficiary
  • details of how the trustee utilised the underlying funds; for example, to satisfy the trustee retention of funds or the trustee working capital condition
  • copies of loan agreements and records showing how the loan repayments were satisfied from time to time.

The ATO acknowledges that family arrangements are typically conducted with a greater level of informality than dealings between unrelated parties. Nonetheless, contemporaneous records which demonstrate the intended objectives should be kept, e.g. in the form of a file note of a meeting.

Notwithstanding that an arrangement is fully documented, s. 100A may still apply.

Further resources and training

Our monthly Online Tax Updates and Public Sessions are excellent and cost effective options to stay on top of your CPD requirements. We present these monthly online, and also offer face-to-face Public Sessions at 17 locations across Australia. ATO guidance in relation to section 100A will be comprehensively covered in these options.

Our 2023 registrations are now open! Save up to 25% by registering for a full series of your choice (tax workshops or online training). Our early bird pricing is our only annual sale, so get in quick!

Link To Table (2)

Personalised training options

We can also present these Updates at your firm or through a private online session, with content tailored to your client base. Call our BDM Caitlin Bowditch at 0413 955 686 to have a chat about your specific needs and how we can assist.

Learn more about in-house training >

Director ID applications due soon and proposed exclusions

Editor’s note: On 30 November, it was announced that if a director lodges their Director ID application by 14 December 2022, no action will be taken in relation to the late application (i.e. no penalties).

Tax agents and advisers have next Wednesday, 30 November 2022 marked in their calendars as the date by which their director clients need to apply for a director identification number, or director ID.

The director ID regime applies to an ‘eligible officer’, who is a director, or alternate director acting in that capacity, of:

  • a company registered under the Corporations Act 2001 (CA), or
  • an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation registered under the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (CATSI Act).

An eligible officer is required to satisfy the Registrar of the Australian Business Registry Services (ABRS) of their identify and requiring the Registrar to record a unique identifier (the director ID) for each individual who consents to being an eligible officer.

The regime commenced on 4 April 2021. The ATO has recently advised that over 1.4 million directors have now applied for their director ID. However with the total director population in Australia estimated to be more than 2.5 million, there are around one million directors who will need to apply in the next few days to remain eligible to run their companies and fines of up to $13,000. Of course, the identification requirement is also intended to have the effect of weeding out and disentitling the many ‘dummy directors’ that currently exist in the ecosystem.

Proposed exclusions for resigned and corporate directors

However there are some classes of directors who will not be required to obtain a director ID under proposed rules. Broadly, the proposed excluded classes fall into two categories:

  • resigned directors
  • corporate directors.

The following draft Legislative Instruments (the draft Instruments) were released on 15 November 2022:

Once finalised, the Instruments will effectively relieve the specified classes of persons from the obligation to obtain a director ID, by excluding them from being an ‘eligible officer’.

Comments and Submissions

Submissions on the draft Instruments are due by 9 December 2022.

Proposed exclusion for resigned directors

Current law

The law presently provides the following transitional timeframes for certain eligible officers to apply for a director ID:

Transitional period for existing eligible officers under the CA:

Persons who were an eligible officer prior to 4 April 2021 must apply no later than 30 November 2022.

Transitional period for new eligible officers under the CA:

Persons who were not an eligible officer prior to 4 April 2021, but became an eligible officer between 4 April 2021 and 31 October 2021, must apply no later than 30 November 2022.

Transitional period for existing eligible officers under the CATSI Act:

Persons who were an eligible officer prior to 4 April 2021 must apply no later than 30 November 2023.

Transitional period for new eligible officers under the CATSI Act:

Persons who were not an eligible officer prior to 4 April 2021, but became an eligible officer between 4 April 2021 and 31 October 2022, must apply no later than 30 November 2023.

Proposed law

The draft Instruments propose to exclude from being an eligible officer persons who have ceased to hold any role as a director or alternate director acting in that capacity prior to:

  • for directors under the CA1 December 2022
  • for directors under the CATSI Act1 December 2023.

Some eligible officers may have resigned in the transitional period, before they were due to obtain a director ID (i.e. before 30 November 2022, or 30 November 2023 for directors of Indigenous corporations). Requiring these persons to obtain a director ID would not achieve the policy intent underlying the director ID regime and would impose a compliance burden on them.

Implications for future directorships

Persons who resigned before 1 December 2022 (or 1 December 2023, for directors of Indigenous corporations) and later become a director again are only excluded from being an eligible officer for the period 4 April 2021 to 30 November 2022 (or 4 April 2021 to 30 November 2023, for directors of Indigenous corporations).

Such a person who later become a director again is not permanently excluded from being an eligible officer. They will need to obtain a director ID prior to any subsequent appointments.

Proposed exclusion for corporate directors

Registerable Australian bodies and registered foreign companies may have corporate directors.  Corporate directors are not individuals and can be sufficiently identified by their ACN or ARBN.

The instrument proposed to be made under the CA excludes corporate directors from being eligible officers. There is no equivalent provision in the instrument proposed to be made under the CATSI Act because corporate directors cannot be appointed under that Act.

Dates of effect of the finalised instruments

To ensure that affected resigned directors benefit from this relief and do not become liable to any penalties for not applying for a director ID, the instrument for resigned directors and non-individual directors under the CA, once finalised, must take retrospective effect from 1 December 2022. The instrument for resigned directors under the CATSI Act must take effect from 1 December 2023.

ATO key messages

The ATO has provided the following key messages and resources:

What is a director ID?

  • A director identification number (director ID) is a unique identifier directors apply for once and keep forever
  • Over time, director ID will help build a fairer business environment by preventing the use of false and fraudulent director identities
  • Directors must apply for their own director ID so they can verify their identity
  • Clients may have seen our recent director ID advertising campaign and contact their tax representative for advice or information
  • As trusted advisors, you can help your clients by providing guidance or helping them obtain documents to complete proof of record ownership however you cannot apply on their behalf

When and how to apply?

  • Directors of companies in Australia need to apply for a director ID by 30 November 2022.
  • There are some exceptions to the 30 November 2022 deadline for directors of a corporation registered with ASIC
  • The fastest way to apply for a director ID is online at gov.au/directorID
  • To apply online, directors require a myGovID with at least a Standard identity strength
  • Directors can streamline their online application by setting up their myGovID with a Strong identity strength
  • For more information on setting up myGovID, visit https://www.mygovid.gov.au/set-up
  • If a director is unable to set up a myGovID, there are alternate ways to apply. See How to apply if you cannot get a myGovID

What to do with your director ID?

  • After receiving your director ID, keep it safe until you need to use it. You can provide your director ID to the record-holder in your company such as the company secretary, another director, or the authorised agent of the company.

Resources

Picture1
Image credit: ATO

Further resources and training

Join us at the beginning of each month as we review the current tax landscape. Our monthly Online Tax Updates and Public Sessions are excellent and cost effective options to stay on top of your CPD requirements. We present these monthly online, and also offer face-to-face Public Sessions at 16 locations across Australia.

Our 2023 registrations are now open! Save up to 25% by registering for a full series of your choice (tax workshops or online training)

Link To Table (2)

Online training

December Tax Update | registrations >

Personalised training options

We can also present these Updates at your firm or through a private online session, with content tailored to your client base. Call our BDM Caitlin Bowditch at 0413 955 686 to have a chat about your specific needs and how we can assist.

Learn more about in-house training >

Introducing our new website and look

The day is finally here; welcome to our new online headquarters!

All of the same content you know and love is still here, in an improved format. We rebuilt our website with our clients front of mind, and it was designed to be even easier to find what you’re looking for.

Refreshing the TaxBanter brand

You might have also noticed that our signature green has been replaced with a brand new colour palette. Over the past few years, we have evolved our offerings to meet the needs of our growing client base.

Our new identity reflects our growth, and our position in the industry as Australia’s leading tailored training provider. It also symbolises our inclusion in the Diverger family of brands, of which the core value is creating positive change in the accounting and wealth industries.

We’ve rolled out our new look throughout our training materials, communications, social media and brochures.

From a client perspective, nothing will change. All of our training sessions, materials, and everything you know us for will remain the same. Most importantly, you’ll continue to receive top-tier service from us.

Questions and feedback

Please contact us via enquiries@taxbanter.com.au or 1300 TAX CPD if you have any questions, we’d love to hear from you.

Can’t find what you’re looking for or find an error? Please send an email to me at laceyj@taxbanter.com.au.

All the best,

Lacey Jarvis
Marketing manager  |  TaxBanter

Stay informed with our newsletter

Join thousands of savvy Australian tax professionals and get our weekly newsletter.

Name(Required)